Australia Exempts YouTube from Social Media Ban, Raising Concerns
Australia has banned social media access for children under 16 but made an exception for YouTube. Australia exempts YouTube arguing it is an educational platform rather than a “core social media application.” This decision followed discussions with company executives and children’s content creators.
The ban, set to take effect by the end of 2025, applies to TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook, and X. These platforms must enforce strict age restrictions or face heavy fines. However, mental health and extremism experts warn that YouTube exposes young users to addictive and harmful content.
Experts Warn of Extremist and Addictive Content
YouTube is the most popular platform among Australian teenagers, with 9 in 10 aged 12-17 using it. Researchers say its algorithm promotes extremist, misogynistic, and conspiracy-driven content.
“YouTube is deeply problematic,” said Lise Waldek, a security studies lecturer at Macquarie University. She cited concerns about extremist material and addictive video content. Helen Young, an expert in radicalisation, added that YouTube’s algorithm often pushes far-right content to young boys.
While all platforms struggle with harmful content, experts question why YouTube, the most widely used, was exempted from the ban.
YouTube’s Algorithm Under Scrutiny
A Reuters investigation tested YouTube’s algorithm by creating accounts pretending to belong to minors. Searches on sex and COVID-19 led to misogynistic and conspiracy-related content within 20 clicks. A search on “European History” surfaced racist material after 12 hours of intermittent browsing.
Reuters flagged six problematic videos to YouTube, which removed only one. YouTube stated it has “strict policies” against hate speech and harmful content and pledged to review flagged material.
The platform insists it is improving its moderation and refining its algorithms. However, critics argue that without regulation, it will continue exposing children to harmful content.
with inputs from Reuters